Some believe that spoken communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

From the point of
see
a division of an ocean or a large body of salt water partially enclosed by land
sea
of communication, numerous individuals accept that the trade of data verbally
instead
of in composing will be more effective. I don't concur with
this
thought and clarify why. On the one hand, it is genuine that in different circumstances, discourse is a perfect way to transmit data vivaciously and promptly. By joining pitch, signals or facial expressions, speakers can eagerly demonstrate data with moment impacts, whereas a composed dialect takes a few times to study and retain substance. In expansion, in critical cases, when it is essential to quickly get its data,
such
as crisis clearing, verbal contact is frequently way better than composed communication, since
this
does not require any composed apparatuses, or when the beneficiaries of the data are individuals who are not able to study and type in as small children Be that as it may , nearly all critical contracts or understandings between people, organizations or nations are ensured by composed archives, and marks are ordinarily considered official affirmation. Usually, since without verbal words, the talked dialect
itself
the thing named or in question
it
is some of the time untrustworthy and delicate, and the deal will most likely be ended if there's no obvious prove between the two parties. Of course, in numerous less formal circumstances, verbal transactions are very intense, but, as a run the show, individuals are not required by law to sign a contract.
Besides
, composing appears more successful than discourse when the data is as well complex or requires a precise understanding, to be specific medicines, informational or enlightening from a specialist. In common, I don't concur with the hypothesis that talked words have a more grounded impact than composed words, since all implies of communication are
similarly
critical, depending on our eagerly and circumstances.
Submitted by superbox8089 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: