In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there: What is your opinion about this?

Presently, the problem of a living space risen into

prominance

the state of being prominent: widely known or eminent

prominence

pre-eminence

preeminence

in many places of the country. There is absolutely no way to build new houses in some cities, and a lot of people suggest to carry out construction in the

countryside

.

However

, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debates. Opponents of urbanisation of former rural state that it would cause a dramatic effect on the natural ecosystem of

such

places. The most drastic consequences are caused by infrastructure that necessarily follows any human settlement-

that is

, roads,

powerlines

Suggestion

power lines

, means of water supply and

such

. The construction of those engineering

project

Suggestion

projects

leads to destruction of natural

bioms

Suggestion

biomes

biomass

balms

of ponds, rivers and forests, causing many animals to migrate or go extinct. The arguments of

enviornmentalists

someone who works to protect the environment from destruction or pollution

environmentalists

do make sense, but

there

Suggestion

they're

also

valuable ideas supporting the

countryside

occupation.

First

of all, not even the most extreme supports of spreading urbanisation

maintain

Suggestion

maintains

that all of the

countryside

should be filled with homes all over the place. In fact, there are good examples of even larger cities

living perhaps

Accept comma addition

living, perhaps

not in harmony with surrounding nature, but at least in some form of cooperation. Having a considerable amount of parks inside inhabited area

help

Suggestion

helps

both people to feel themselves better and plants and animals to have some sort of home. If I may present an example, the city which is covered with trees and largely unoccupied, being a nice counterpart to heavily populated nearby districts. In conclusion, I would like to stress that while opponents of

countryside

settlements have many valid points, the situation is not as drastic as they

potray

portray in words

portray

portrayed

it, and the

co-existence

existing peacefully together

coexistence

of human population with nature is quite possible.