Money offered for post graduate research is limited; as a consequence, some people argue that financial support from the government should only be provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. Do you agree or disagree?

Due to limited availability of funds for higher education, it is often recommended that financial assistance should be offered to scientific research
instead
of allocating funds to supplementary subjects.
This
notion should be accepted as many facts in favour of practical subjects could be considered. Certainly, the major argument in the favour of subsidising science and technology is rooted in the fact that advancement in science and technology not only reflects the prosperity of the nations but
also
vouchsafes the other domains. To illustrate, it can be said that investments in scientific research, including diagnostic and curative measures ensure the sound health of its people.
Secondly
, it
also
paves a way towards the holistic development of a country by facilitating innovations and discoveries. Another compelling reason might be due to unreservedly salience of science in terms of boosting the economy and living standards of the country. To be precise, a technically strong democracy can ensure the safety and security of the nation and stay connected to the rest of the world in order to enhance trade and contribute in elevating the financial status.
For instance
, owing to the unrivalled quality of equipment, Japan is known as the world’s leading community.
However
, one might argue that the importance of supplementary subjects
such
as; economics and statistics should not be neglected as it assists the nation in policy formation and analysing the current situation.
Therefore
, an equal proportion of financial assistant is required for these areas. From the analysis of the above discussion, one can observe that, evidently, government should pour more money in scientific research owing to its pivotal role in comprehensive growth of a state.
Nonetheless
, it is pertinent that others domains should be taken into account while distributing the funds.
Submitted by almightychoice.melbourne on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: