some people think that government should provide assistance to all kind of artists including painter musician and poets etc. however other people think that it is a waste of money discuss both view and give your opinion.

Many people's lives are richer because of art, music, painting pictures sculpture poems and dance.There are some who claim that it is important to support the composer and others who are opposed to rule funding.

This

essay intends to analyse both

perspective

Suggestion

perspectives

,

howeverhowever

Suggestion

however however

side with the former view. There are many reasons why unions should fund artist.The contributors of painter to the society are very essential.Art can bring out people creativity view and personalities.

For example

, we learn about our history, tradition and culture through movies, songs and painting made by artist.Artist are the media of diffusing tradition.All kinds of tradition are the basis of a country without which the country cannot be civilised.

Swadisht

are the ambassador of culture and play a vital role in the valuing the level of civilization of the country. What is a major form of cultural abundance. Another important aspect of

this

is that it is an ancient means of communication. Our language is a result of people need of communicating. What is what differentiates us from animals. Art is our soul and it is a source of courage. Art

also entertain

Suggestion

also entertains

has also entertained

us.

finally government

Accept comma addition

Finally, government

Finally government

should fund artist because earning a livelihood from art is difficult, especially in the budding stages. Opponents of government funding on artists say that

money

spent on the arts could have been used for considerably more vital purposes. They have strong reason as a nation's health and well being should be paramount. The idea that elderly people are forced to wait for essential operations whilst the

money

be required to increase available medical provision spent on opera and ballet in plainly immoral. There are

also

more deserving social causes of the

money

that should be considered before the arts. Homelessness unemployment illiteracy all of these deserve to be addressed before

money

is spent on what is

initially

little more than entertainment. To summarise, I would like to say that even thought both sides have a strong

argument spending

Accept comma addition

argument, spending

on ART is a must but fund allocated for spending on basic health care and education should not be diverted to the arts.There should be separate funding for heart as it is as important as other basic necessities.