Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the recent few decades, free health service is the most conspicuous trend in today's world. Not only

this

service extends human life expectancy, but

also

gives moral boost for better standards of living. As

such

, there are both merits and demerits for

this

trend,

this

essay will explain the significance of having mandatory medical treatments for any

country

.

Firstly

, providing cost less medical treatments will reduce financial burden on low income people and acquire treatment on a wide range of medication;

however

, right to equality will be implemented and every citizen will be treated with similar facilities.

For instance

, Australian citizens get a Medicare card for their

country

citizens to get basic health treatments with no charge. Needless to say, many people will be benefited by cost free medical services across globe.

Secondly

, another possible solution, the

government

can reduce the burden on modern medical treatments by eliminating taxes on medical treatments.

However

, the

government

can enforce tax incentives on costly medication or tax exemption on medical insurances to improve declining mortality rate.

For example

, many developing countries are giving tax exemption to encourage people to take an insurance policy to reduce financial burdens.

Hence

, a collective approach from the

government

and the

country

residents can make free treatments achievable. In conclusion, every

country

should consider free medical services to every individual and help reduce declining death rate.

Finally

, the role of

government

is too dire to ignore.