Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defender’s past record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.

In some Countries, lawyers do not have permission in the entrance of the offenders prior history of evil-deed throughout the judgement process, but some of them think about the smoothness of the scenario.

This

essay agrees with the statement.

This

essay will discuss the reason behind the need of permission to justify a convicted

person

. It is necessary to read an offender's previous

life

during a persecution, and most of the countries around the world, presumably, follow

this

approach. Some countries

in particular

, Britain and Australia,

however

, do not allow

this

system. They only consider the current fault a

person

commits, which probably sometimes violate the human rights. In

this

system a judicial board can not judge a criminal

case

properly.

For example

, a

person

having a licenced revolver if

faces

Suggestion

faced

an unfortunate

life

threatening situation, shoot to save his

life

, and surrenders before

law

Suggestion

the law

. It should not be legal to ignore his prior

life

history as well as occupation during the prosecution of his

case

, and give him the capital punishment.

On the contrary

, if the jury board

take

Suggestion

takes

is taken

into consideration the offender's past delinquent documents, it will consume time to give the judgement.

Besides

, it will need more financial support for the complainant to continue the

case

.

Additionally

,

this

might give mental strength to the accused

person

.

Furthermore

, the lengthy prosecution process may not hear a right decision.

This

is because, the wealthy criminal may pressurise the

delator

a muscle or nerve that dilates or widens a body part

dilator

, and there might be a possibility to withdraw the

case

.

As a result

the jury-board dismisses the

case

, and the perpetrator remains unpunished. In

conclusion it

Accept comma addition

conclusion, it

can be said that, though avoiding the criminal previous crime reports lessen the time, but

this

process bears a chance of giving improper punishment to the offender. It is,

therefore

, urgent to go through the prior-

life

history of

a

Suggestion

an

evil-

deed

no longer having or seeming to have or expecting to have life

dead

person

throughly

in an exhaustive manner

thoroughly

to give a right decision.