Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

It is true that the usage of vernacular languages is decreasing day by day with a rapid pace and society is adopting major languages for a better communication with people of other ethnicity.

Although

such

trend may prove fruitful for the concept of globalisation,

however

, at the same time it is a threat to the identity of many local cultures.

First

of all, the world would be a better place if there are less dialects as it would lead to less ambiguous.

For example

, it would be easier for two persons who have different backgrounds to understand each other.

Further

, all the opportunities are presented at the far away places on earth would be available to everyone.

Thus

, it is the

first

step for an equivocal society.

Moreover

, hesitation to face a new tradition or culture will be mitigated due to language bar.

Hence

, less languages spoken offers a better earth.

On the other hand

, the diminishing vernaculars will lead to the possibility of loosing the understanding of the artefacts or ancient text preserved by centuries for the benefit of the mankind. Texts like Ayurveda, Which has significant knowledge about medical science is available in Sanskrit and without proper knowledge about

such

language, it is impossible to access

such

books.Apart from that, without vernaculars a tribe or a particular culture will lose its identity and self respect which took decades to build.

Thus

, preserving

such

local languages becomes essential for us. In a nutshell, it could be inferred that while a single language is preferred for smooth functioning of the present and is

also

advocated by many, at the same time saving

such

vulnerable languages is our prime duty as well.