Watching a live performance such as a play, concert, or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is considered that, attending two concerts, sport competitions and any live plays is more entertaining than watching similar events on TV. I strongly agree with

this

statement, because people can get along with new friends and they might have some acquaintance about some musicians and their accompaniments, but at the same time attenders may feel

little

Suggestion

less

awkward about money problems.

Firstly

, in urban areas there

are

Suggestion

is

a plethora of halls for concerting, sporting and presenting any plays, which means cities are provided with many entertainment facilities. I am of the opinion that, attenders of the events can have casual friends (who have similar models) while they are spending time in the same territory, because

this

situation is accessible to accomplish to have fresh humans.

Secondly

, most of the individuals are accustomed to take photos with Chilean sportsmen or well-known singers, and at the same time they see an abundance of musical instruments which are being strummed by accompanists. Journalists propaganda shows that, while the concerts and competitions, fans of the participators prefer to know more about their models.

Lastly

, there are many followers who are fans of familiar people have absence of money, but their aspirations show that to attend live events. On my presumption, they desire to acclaim familiar people. Another point is that, most of them do not have enough devices to watch afterwards,

such

as big TV screen and CDs. In my recapitulation, often times it does not demand live of remote plays, it only demands some data about how to be relaxed