Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage employees who are older to retire. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that giving a job opportunity, to young peoples' organizations should motivate their older staffs to retire early. I disagree with
this
argument because aged staff members have considerable knowledge and vast experience, and solve complex problems with ease in the industry.
Firstly
,
although
young staff members are essential in the organization to some extent, veteran employees have significant technical skills in their field because they have spent many years of their life in that particular technology.
In other words
, they know how to handle day to day industrial operations and run the business smoothly just because of their experience.
Consequently
, the organization sale can be increased if they hired vastly experienced staffs.
For instance
, a survey has been done by Cambridge University found that 55 percent of the CEO of companies has age between 55 years to 60 years. If the organization has old staffs, it will be considerably beneficial to earn more profit than the company who has young teams.
Secondly
, elderly teams can quickly solve intricate problems, which arise suddenly in the industry.
This
is because they resolved complicated technical issues, which cannot be addressed by the fresher immediately.
As a result
, the company does not halt any operation or service for long hours due to quick response.
For example
, most companies in Japan have more than 40 % of Engineers are old and they know how to fix the problem quickly, and the Japanese government gives extra salary to those workers who are doing the job at the age of 60. In conclusion, I think that aged employees play a crucial role in the company's growth because they have experienced staff members and technical knowledge in the smart way to solve any complicated issues in the corporation.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: