Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is believed that the economic

development

is the solution to end the

hunger

and poverty, whereas the

development

of economic should be stopped due to the harmful effects it has on the environment. In my point of view, both view sides will have its benefits and drawbacks. In

this

essay, I will discuss both arguments. On the one hand, the economic

development

brings a significant number of effective measures to tackle the

hunger

and poverty population.

To begin

with, a good economy will create more job opportunities for those who has a low income of the homeless people, and so on.

Besides

, creating employment opportunities will ensure the stable income for those kinds of people, it would lead to the decline of the crime’s proportion, so the residents’

life

in a country would be better.

Moreover

, again sting the

hunger

, the government should invest the money in the agriculture industry.

For example

, when the agriculture uses the modern technology like automatic machine, the productivity will be boosted and increased the food production, so the percentage of

hunger

will be dramatically decreased.

On the other hand

, stopping the economic growth is an ideal because the growth of the economy has affected negatively on the environment. As the

development

of economics, a substantial number of factories are built which is the main reason that affect the environment.

For example

, the large amount of carbon dioxide emits every day from those factories which leads to the climate changes and badly damage the flora and fauna. More factories, the greenhouse gas will be increased lead in the global and threatened the human’s

life

and loss the natural habitat. To sum up,

although

development

of the economy brings many benefits to the residents in a country, it will damage the natural

life

and citizens’

life

quality. In my view side, I think the government would find a good way to balance the growing economic and natural habitat.