Is freedom of speech necessary in a democratic society? Do you agree or disagree?

Freedom

of

speech

has been one of the most debated topics in the world of late. At the simplest,

freedom

of

speech

is an innate right of a citizen in democratic countries. Absence of

freedom

of

speech

could potentially harm not only the

society but

Accept comma addition

society, but

also

the nation as a whole in the long term. I completely agree with

this

statement. The constitutional right of

freedom

of

speech

and expression was never so prominent until the

last

century.

This

concept was originated back in the sixth century in England, with a 'soft' version only to evolve with passing time. Currently, it is termed as one of the cherished and basic rights of the

society

.

Speech

is a basic vehicle for communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas. One of the brightest points of

this

concept is people are able to share their perspective without hindrance and fear.

This

facilitates the inclusive growth of

society

. It is often seen where

freedom

of

speech

is suppressed, the

society

becomes lawless, and many people's lives get threatened. Ergo, it is hard to survive without it. On the downside, some people argue about the limit of

freedom

of

speech

. In some countries,

freedom

of

speech

exists, but not absolute. There is a growing concern about how

this

concept is being misused by some extremists. Hate speeches, fighting words, obscenity, child pornography and defamation are some instances that have taken place in the name of expression of

speech

. It is absolutely controversial in

this

sense.

Furthermore

, some individuals judge ethical beliefs differently because of their race, sex, and background. In a nutshell, a true and pristine sense of expression, of

speech

is a part of

society

. Inevitably, a line of demarcation must be drawn between right and wrong to keep its original form intact.