Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world.

Recent years have witnessed a close relationship between countries thanks to the globalization and many countries feel obligated to offer help to those in need. Some people sing praise for it while others reckon

this

gesture as a waste of

money

. Those supporting

this

idea hold grounds. For a start, aid

money

from rich countries can help eliminate poverty of the poor ones. There’s a huge gap between the developed countries and poor regions in the form of science, health, education and so on.

As a result

, poverty as long as other problems

such

as hunger and

the scarce

Suggestion

the scarcity

of water prevails in these countries. And should they receive the aid

money

, they can employ

this

money

to improve people’s living conditions.

Besides

, rich countries can offer medical care. Take the novel

coronavirus

as an example. China has sent many medical groups to the relatively poor countries and denoted a large number of medical supplies, without which the situation in these countries may worsen. The argument that

such

aid is useless rests chiefly on the fact the

money

may be the source of corruption.

Instead

of investing

this

money

in the aspects mentioned above, they are likely to take it into private accounts, which totally defeats the purpose. From my perspective, rich countries should assume the responsibility to help others because it benefits the donator in turn. They can transfer production to lower-cost places, which not only solves the problem of low rate of employment in the developing countries but

also

make full use of the local resources. Meanwhile, the beneficiary countries ought to enhance the supervision to ensue that the

money

is in place