Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people believe that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree?

I think that setting more

detective

on the

street

is reduced for a minor

crime

, but other crimes have to need another way measures. Nowadays, the crimes are artful and several. The minor

crime

is,

for example

, pick pocket, snatch and vandalism. Their punishment is not strict to compare with murder,

therefore

a greater number of people that are a minor

crime

.

Moreover

, the minor

crime

is not easy to arrest the criminal at that moment, because it does not take a long time to have made the

case

, it may take a time to done few seconds to a few minutes. In

this

case

, setting more

detective

on the

street

is good for preventing the

case

. The

detective

could stand at many points

that is

likely to occur a

case

and could patrol around in a city. The people take warning if the

detective

would be set there.

On the other hand

, other

case

,

for example

, murder, bank robbery and internet fraud do not affect that setting

detective

in the

street

. Because, a murder and a bank robbery would be planned, they are not an impulsive action. Their

case

is difficult to prevent by

detective

before they have done it.

Also

, the internet fraud is difficult to prevent too, they would do

crime

online and it does not matter whether

detective

stands in the

street

.

In addition

, if the

detective

increase for setting on the road, another

case

would be increased. They would not afford to work for another

case

. In conclusion, setting

detective

more on the road effects for reducing a minor

crime

, but another

case

might be increased. I think it is not the only way that sort out all of

case

.