Some people think parents should supervise their children’s activities closely, while others believe children should have more freedom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many hold that children should be supervised strictly by their parents, while others claim it would be much better to give them more autonomy. In

this

essay, I will discuss both sides and give my own opinion. On the one hand, taking their youngsters under close

control

is one of the

responsibilites

the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force

responsibilities

of parents. Strict

control

might play a big role in their offspring's

upbringing

, through which they are brought up to behave well when they reach adulthood.

Secondly

, strict

upbringing

, in my perspective, may lead children to become more responsible. Because via

this

way, they are used to behave according to their parent's words.

Therefore

, the close

control

is the essential part of

upbringing

young people.

On the other hand

, it might be appropriate to give them more autonomy. The reason for

that is

constant close

control

might cause children to lose their faith in most things as they do what their parents say.

For example

, they may cease performing their

avtivities

any specific behavior

activities

which they are fascinated due to what their parent say.

As a result

of

this

, they lose interest to do them. In order to avoid

this

from being happened, young kids should be given freedom

in particular

extent. In conclusion, both restricted autonomy and giving independence to children while

upbringing

process have advantages as well as bad sides. While via close

control

, children become more responsible, through being autonomous, they can do what they want, which may serve good things in

thier

of them or themselves

their

future. In my opinion, both views are right

in particular

extent.