government investment in the arts, such as music and theater, is a waste of money.Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree with statement.

Whilst some people are of the view that the leading authorities should allocate money for arts referring to music and theatre.Others believe that governments should address their funding to the public services

instead

of spending it on the recreational activities.In my opinion, I totally agree that public services merit government funding more than arts. On the one hand, it is undeniable that the arts provide people with entertainment and yield various psychological rewards

such

as relief from stress;

however

, art institutions are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector.

therefore

Suggestion

Therefore

, these facilities can generate its own profit without the governmental financial assistance.

For example

, In 2014, according to an article published in The New York Times, about 80% of the concerts that held in the summer time earn more than 3 million dollars.

Thus

, business people prefer to invest in the arts more than anything else.

On the other hand

, it is evidently clear that public sectors

such

as schools, roads and hospitals determine the quality of life for the citizens.

In other words

, if the government ignored these vital facilities, people would live unhealthy and unfulfilled lives.For instance, according to a questionnaire administered by researchers at Chicago university, the vast majority of students need a bigger library as the current one is almost busy all the time, but they did not ask for a park or playing fields. In conclusion, In the light of what have been discussed,

although

, recreational activities are of a high value for one's well being, it is still not deserving government spending.It is highly recommended that the construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration.