Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

There is no doubt that dressing styles vary greatly among professions. While some institutes consider their employees’ attire as principal, I would strongly argue that job performance offers more significant benefits to those organizations. Regarding the former, dress code is widely considered to represent the public image of

company

Suggestion

the company

a company

.

This

is mainly chiefly because professionals are easily judged on their appearance by their clients, which would possibly influence their outcome. To illustrate, a salesman being well-dressed could elicit impression of professionalism on his customers.

Consequently

,

this

could lead to the desirable production of his institute.

However

, I utterly believe that task performance substantially contributes to achieving organization’s development.

This

means that staff's productivity constitutes the outcome of their institute.

For instance

, if an employee always dresses well, yet lacks professional skills, he is likely to become the dead weight for his colleagues,

thus

hinders the gross income of the company.

Furthermore

, it is unnecessary for the majority of organizations to require their staff to dress smartly which, in turn, might exasperate them. Taking Dell for an example, as

this

technology company prefers its employees to work from home where they are able to freely don and its professional result is the utmost concentration, it is work quality to become their major focus to meet their company’s goals. In conclusion,

although

well-dressed workmen could give a good impression on others, it is my view that effective and efficient production among staff members should be strongly promoted to achieve their organization's greatest outcome.