In
this
day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on whether or not the authorities should charge a fee on drivers who utilize their private transports during rush hour to diminish the rate of Linking Words
air
pollution. Use synonyms
Although
there are a number of people who think that policy is negative, I personally support Linking Words
this
opinion for the following reasons.
Linking Words
To begin
with, charging fees for driving during peak hours would ease traffic congestion since most commuters will react sensitively to additional financial fees. Linking Words
In particular
, Linking Words
this
practice acts as an incentive for them to drive cars less often, reducing the number of vehicles on the road. Linking Words
In addition
, if punishments are applied, drivers tend to choose the public transports, especially buses and raise their awareness of protecting the environment. Linking Words
As a result
, Linking Words
this
would bring good effects to Linking Words
air
deterioration in terms of reducing smoke from private cars.
On top of that, it is true that imposing extra expense in rush hours facilitates the preservation of the natural environment by using the revenue for the public. Use synonyms
For example
, in Canada, the fund has been relocated by the government for building public facilities Linking Words
such
as parks and zoos. Linking Words
This
not only caters to the recreational needs of residents but Linking Words
also
boosts the Linking Words
air
quality in the long run. Had it not been for Use synonyms
this
approach, the polluted Linking Words
air
would have not been fixed efficiently.
To sum up, there is no doubt that imposing serve taxes to save Use synonyms
air
environment has proven to be effective. Use synonyms
Therefore
, I believe that Linking Words
this
idea would be beneficial to both the planet and society.Linking Words
keokeo125