In number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that this money should be spent on improving public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

High-speed
inter-city
traveling between cities
intercity
trains are now a common sight in Europe, China, and Japan. Due to the success of these rail networks, a rising number of people believe that constructing new railway lines of
this
type is a necessity.
Conversely
, there is a sizeable group who
hold
Suggestion
holds
the view that the money would be better invested in upgrading existing public
transport
infrastructure. Those in favour of connecting cities via high-speed trains believe that a modern society needs an advanced
transport
system
that is
also
affordable.
In other words
, these
transport
systems allow people to travel quickly and cheaply, which is desirable in terms of economic growth and social connection. To be precise, by reducing the cost and travel time, people will be more able to conduct business and visit relatives than they have in the past when they needed to be able to afford a plane ticket or endure a long and uncomfortable journey by bus or slow train.
Nevertheless
, opponents argue that already-existing public
transport
should be improved before embarking on a high-speed rail project.
This
is mainly due to the fact that day-to-day public
transport
is a more immediate problem. Old buses pollute the city air with
thick acrid
Accept comma addition
thick, acrid
smoke, while their degraded condition makes people unwilling to ride them, and
this
only exacerbates the problem of traffic congestion and air pollution in major cities.
Therefore
,
this
issue should be fixed before any large-scale nationwide project is undertaken. Overall, while having cities connected by a modern high-speed rail network is a positive thing that brings many benefits, improving public transportation as it exists today should be the priority as
this
will have a more immediate and measurable benefit for people’s lives.
Submitted by pablojmartos on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: