Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is an undeniable fact that wildlife conservation is vital for mankind. While few individuals think that it is ok to preserve only some of them, others opine that all wild animals need equal attention.

This

essay will consider both sides and will provide an opinion at the conclusion. On the one hand, people argue that it is essential to prevent specific species of wild animals. Individuals, who support

this

argument think that, cost incurred to prevent all wild animals would be expensive and could

turnout

Suggestion

turn out

to be an additional burden on

Government

Suggestion

the Government

.

Additionally

, the same fund could be utilized effectively for other human development projects like improving medical facilities or education.

For instance

,

Tigers

Suggestion

the Tigers

are in

process

Suggestion

the process

of extinction so

Suggestion

of extinction, so

authorities can focus on preserving

this

animal rather than concentrating on all

.

Accept space

.

So based on the above reasons, it is key to spend money on endangered species alone.

On the other hand

, the supporters of all wild animals denote that these animals are key factors for maintaining our ecosystem.

In addition

to

this

, many wild animals help humans in providing essential medicine for major diseases.

For example

, snake venom is used in

treatment

Suggestion

the treatment

of heart related issues.

In addition

to that, if we fail to provide equal concentration

on

Suggestion

of

all wild animals

then

we will see most of wild

animals

Suggestion

animal

extinction in coming years. To recapitulate,

Although

there are financial implications in preserving all wild animals, it is pivotal for us to treat every wild animal conservation with equality in the intent of maintaining our ecosystem.