Transporting large amount of food to richer countries from developing world is having an impact on air pollution and climate change. Some people say such imports should therefore be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Nowadays, the world has become too much connected. Goods are transported all over the globe.

However

,

air

pollution

and climate change can be increased, when a large amount of

food

is transported.

Hence

, some people think that developed countries should reduce the process of importing

food

from poorer countries. In my opinion, I totally disagree about the reduction of

food

Transportation. The world may suffer if

such

kind of reduction is activated. Developing countries, mainly depend on the money comes from selling

this

type of product. Reducing the importation may force some countries to face financial problem.

For example

, Sudan has around 46 % of its income from exporting

food

to Saudi Arabia and the gulf area.

In addition

, some countries are not able to produce their own

food

. These countries, which have no enough space to farm must get

food

from other places.

Thus

, the reduction can bring different types of issues to both sides of the equation. Indeed, the world must deal with many

pollution

causes to handle

air

pollution

and climate. Plants are considered as the main cause of

air

pollution

. According to a recent study, 45% of

air

pollution

is due to industrial activities.

Besides

, the emitted cars' smoke plays a significant role in the case of climate change because of the number of cars.

For instance

, only Cairo has around 30 million cars that pollute the

air

.

Therefore

, many steps can be taken before deciding to decrease

food

importation. To conclude, I believe that

food

transporting has to be normally done.

This

guarantees

food

for rich counties and money for developing countries. The

pollution

issues can be solved by looking at the real factor of the problem.