It is often argued that using genetic engineering in agriculture, medicine and transplantation is good solving in limited materials. But, I am not sure
that and I partly disagree with
idea and
essay will discuss about it.
of all, world health organisation and other respected communities understood meal problems across the globe. In African,
latinrelating to languages derived from Latin
American and Asian countries having
problems. All of
followed by
of
, not enough rain and not enough measure of
technicof or relating to technique or proficiency in a practical skill
. In my opinion,
of the
to solve
problem would be genetic engineering.
, with help genetic engineering in agriculture possible to find out new type of seeds for growing strong crops where rain
hardly ever,
as decisions would be save
of
African childSuggestion
an African child
African children
the African child
and people.
, from the other side genetic engineering is dangerous for natural products and could damage on
of humanity. Manufactures of developed country use
modified vegetables in their
market placesthe world of commercial activity where goods and services are bought and sold
and want to get faith and higher incomes. But, no
tells us how
us vegetables influence for our
instance,
of the respectable news
published article directed to GMV. Here was about Mars and kidder company products
wherehave the quality of being; (copula, used with an adjective or a predicate noun)
used
modified
dangerous for
children,
In conclusion, I know that genetic engineering has
two sideSuggestion
two, side
two sides
two sides sides
of
directed to quickly solve meal problems and another to medical need of in
. But I strongly believe that all of
must work only for developing our health and fighting with meal problem in poor countries.