Until now there has been a serious increase in crime rates in several countries.
is one of the problems that has invited much debate over the past few years regarding the division in
and social spending for the state budget. Some people say that one of the most important rights that must be given by the state's authority to the people is the protection and safety of citizens compared to their prosperity. In
essay, I will explain why many citizens ask for more funds for
, and the author will
explain why the
does not need to increase spending on
.
One of the main reasons why many people are asking for more funds to be improved compared to social welfare is because citizens want to have a very strong military force in their regions. Because the stronger a state's military,
they will get respect from other countries and maybe even that country will become a leader in the region which will certainly provide a great advantage for their country. Another reason lies in the problem of terrorism; currently many countries are facing a serious threat and even experiencing terrorist attacks in big cities.
, there are some who argue that increasing police force will threaten terrorist organizations, and may arrest them before the terrorists carry out attacks.
, if the
increases their expenditure on military
, it will automatically reduce spending on social benefits that can affect people's prosperity, especially on
. Because citizens have the right to get
care, as well as the medicines they need. If the
does not provide adequate resources in
,
the poor and middle income people will find it difficult to get proper
care. If
expenses are reduced, the cost of life-saving operations and treatments will be quite expensive to cause bankruptcy. It will
affect aid for those who need it. If the
cuts assets to unemployed people, it can lead to bigger problems
as homelessness, theft and increased crime. Meanwhile, if the people who need to get adequate support
as work centres and finance, they are less likely to be a threat to other communities.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that the
is required to reduce spending on citizens' social benefits for national
. State security is indeed an important aspect, but does not rule out sacrificing social benefits for the welfare of citizens.
the
must strike a balance between spending on safety and social benefits.