It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been argued whether so much money should be spent to repair old buildings or it is better to allocate them in
favor
promote over another
favour
of building modern infrastructure. Even though modern buildings are more practical, I believe that the upkeep of
old architecture
Suggestion
the old architecture
is important for cultural heritage. One reason why maintenance of old buildings should be removed from a
city
budget is that many structures were built either after crises or during rapid development of a
city
. Those buildings were constructed with cheap materials and poorly qualified
labor
a social class comprising those who do manual labor or work for wages
labour
, with one purpose to satisfy the demand of low-cost and affordable constructions.
Moreover
, the
life-span
the period during which something is functional (as between birth and death)
lifespan
of those buildings is already ended, many of them can barely meet today's safety standards.
On the other hand
, there are plenty of old buildings that survived through the centuries and hold the unique identity of the
city
, which is impossible to replace. Despite that fact that modern facilities which are made from concrete and glass have spread across Moscow
city
, the government managed to save the historical
city
center
an area that is approximately central within some larger region
centre
, which is an incredible piece of architecture. Not only old buildings play a significant role in a cultural identity of the
city
, but they
also
attract a lot of tourists and local citizens who want to see a living history. In conclusion, not every single building deserves to be a part of the history, but some of them definitely should be saved for future generations. I'm convinced that the government should not keep a blind eye on historical constructions because they are part of history.
Submitted by Nataliia Litovchenko on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: