Some people think that private health care is better for the people. Others say that health care should be free of charge and run by the government. How far do you agree or disagree with the statement.

Insurance

can be termed as a shield of protection for

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

human life.

However

, when it comes to purchasing one, people are bifurcated upon their views,

while

some rely

towards

Change the preposition

on

upon

show examples

the thought that people should own a private one,

whereas

, others run with

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

thought that it is the ruling

parties

Change noun form

party's

show examples

prime responsibility to provide one. My internal thought process drives me to vouch for the latter and

this

essay apprises the reasons for the same. The prime reason for digesting the fact that the health policy should be supplied by the ministry is because of the existence of the overly burdened taxpayers. To elucidate more on

this

, the central power in almost every country, slams the public with massive tax rates,

while

the tax rates

being

Wrong verb form

are

show examples

directly proportional to the income. The

pay

Change the verb form

paid

show examples

number as it increments, the gigantic tariff bracket an individual falls into which is an unfortunate sight to watch.

Thus

, leaving less room

of

Change preposition

for

show examples

saving and meeting the expenses for basic amenities.

Therefore

, the authority can chime in to cut off the burden of its citizens by extending a

state owned

Add a hyphen

state-owned

show examples

health care procedure.

For instance

, any ruling party which comes into

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

power in Sweden owns the credit of shielding their citizens' lives with the union's

insurance

.

However

, it is fair to deny an individual to own a private plan because of

multifarious

Correct article usage

the multifarious

show examples

misleading plans a non-government firm offers. Having said that, these deceiving programs are not only expensive

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

irrationally accepted across many hospitals.

Thus

, the statement holds true that a person's intention should be to own a

government funded

Add a hyphen

government-funded

show examples

insurance

.

To conclude

, having considered the aforementioned reasons, it is obvious that

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

privately owned

insurance

seems to be elusive,

thus

it is recommendable for an individual not to trap themselves in

this

vicious market, but opt for the proposal covered under the local ruling

parties

Change noun form

parties'

party's

show examples

expenditure.