Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There are many individuals who believe that harsh punishments are necessary for driving violations, which in turn minimizes transportation mishaps and there are some who think that there are other methods that would be better achieve road safety. I strongly agree that harsher penalties are imperative in decreasing transport related mishaps.

Firstly

, the varying methods in treating roadway mishaps includes payment of fines or general warning could serve its purposes,

however most

Accept comma addition

however, most

highway tragedies often leading to loss of life and property and these measures do not measure up as an adequate consequence for the crime.

For example

, a study shows that 80% of traffic accidents occur

as a result

of intoxication while driving or lack of concentration

as a result

of phone usage.

This

often leads to car crashes, property loss and unfortunately, individual's death.

On the other hand

, severe methods which may include community service, loss of driving license and jail time are important in achieving desired safety.

For example

, a drunken driver who has caused tragedy on the highway can have his license revoked, which in turns means he is unable to create another mishap.

Secondly

, the presence of stringent sentences can lead to behavioural change in people.

For example

, when individuals are aware of the harsh sentencing for violating transport rules, they strive to ensure that they do not offend, as they know the consequences of violation. In conclusion, in decreasing transportation tragedies there are various ways of ensuring offenders are brought to justice,

however

, I personally believe that severe sentences are pertinent in achieving traffic security