The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The Nuclear

power

debate is a long-running controversy about the risks and benefits of using nuclear reactors to generate electricity for civilian purposes. Should nuclear energy be banned or developed is a difficult decision for each government.

Also it

Accept comma addition

Also, it

is something that will affect the life in which we live in the future. In my opinion, nuclear

power

should be banned.

First

of all, the disposal of nuclear waste can cause much headache. The waste remains radioactive for almost thousands of years. What is worse, there exist no long-term storage solutions for radioactive waste. It means that we have to build temporary facilities, which would run out space and money.

Besides

, the safety of nuclear talent is a very worrying thing. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine led to the deaths of 30 employees in the initial explosion and has had a variety of negative health effects on thousands across Russia and Eastern Europe. In 2011, A massive tsunami caused three nuclear meltdowns in Japan, resulting in the release of radioactive materials into the surrounding area. The nuclear industry has proposed new reactor designs that they suggest are safer.

However

, these designs are generally untested, and there is no guarantee that the reactors will be operated correctly.

In addition

to the major disasters

such

as explosions in nuclear

power

plants, the risk of leakage caused by the

uranium

mining and transportation process of nuclear

power

plants cannot be easily ignored.

Uranium

mining causes lung cancer in large numbers of miners because

uranium

mines contain natural radon gas, some of whose decay products are carcinogenic. Studies

also

show increased risk for those who reside near a nuclear

power

plant, especially for childhood cancers

such

as leukaemia. What is more, we have to consider the cost we build a nuclear function shrub. According to the study, nuclear talent flower construction costs-mainly materials, labour, and engineering—rose by 185 percent between 2000 and 2007. More recently, costs have increased even faster. Meantime, on a worldwide scale, high-grade

uranium

deposits will soon be exhausted. More and more rock needs to be excavated in order to extract the same amount of

uranium

, which results in cost increases whilst aggravating environmental pollution. Maybe few people know that large amounts of drink are necessary to separate the

uranium

from the ore. Yet many

uranium

mining areas suffer water shortage. The enormous drink consumption of mining operations and

uranium

ore processing plants competes with the rain needs of people, livestock and agriculture. Some people believe nuclear

power

is one of the answers to the energy gap owning to its effective electricity production.

However

, they ignore that challenging market conditions have left the nuclear industry struggling to compete. Strict regulations on maintenance, staffing levels, operator training, and shrub inspections have become a financial burden for the industry. In conclusion, the disadvantages of nuclear talent generation far outweigh the benefits. Banning nuclear function makes sense.