Some people think that the government is wasting money of the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Experts throughout both the developed and developing worlds have debated whether investing money on various forms of arts is beneficial for society. Some believe it is a waste of money, but
i
refers to the speaker or writer
I
strongly disagree.
This
essay will present example and facts from The University of Toronto and The government of India to present arguments and prove points. On one hand, there is ample of evidence that arts improve the quality of
life
in a society. The central reason behind
this
is two folds,
Firstly
Creativity is integral part of human behaviour and humans thrive to show and enjoy his or her creativity,
Secondly
investing in arts and culture is directly proportional to elevating the living standard and quality of
life
.
For example
Empirical study conducted by The University of Toronto as well as by The Government of India states that happiness quotient of society increases by 70% by improving the art and cultural infrastructure of a city.
Thus it
Accept comma addition
Thus, it
can be concluded that the ministry should invest in improving its arts infrastructure and cultural heritage.
On the other hand
doubts over extra government expenditure cannot be ruled out. Investing on country's cultural asset means burden on taxpayers and less money will be provided for other economic activities. Importance of business development cannot be underestimated, but value of arts in day to day
life
gives much more meaning to human
life
.
Accept space
.
Thus it
Accept comma addition
Thus, it
is possible to state beyond doubt that the largest drawback of not giving adequate importance to art and culture can decrease the happiness of the public. From the arguments and examples given,
this
can be easily concluded that investing in arts and culture is important and need much attention like any other ministry and I highly agree with the state's approach to elevate cultural heritage of a country.
Submitted by POORNIMA RAWAT on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • enriching society
  • promoting cultural understanding
  • development of talent
  • creative industries
  • economic benefits
  • generate revenue
  • cultural heritage
  • identity
  • prioritize spending
  • needs of the majority
What to do next:
Look at other essays: