In a world
that is
far more globalised than ever before, vehicle transportation is one of the most controversial issues today. While some people argue that huge amount of cash should be allotted to building high speed railways, others think that cash should be spent on renovating the current public transportation. In
this
essay, I am going to shed some light on both points of view and extend my full support to the former view.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that the government should allocate a significant amount of fund on a new speed train railway. The main reason for believing
this
is probably the importance of time.
In other words
, they say time is gold so every
second
is precious,
also
commuting by outdated
transit
means is time consuming and exhausting. One good illustration for
this
is fast transportation can encourage people to use more public
transit
than before that will result in traffic congestion reduction and clean air. As travelling has become a daily routine nowadays, a
second
reason supporting
this
argument might be the new high speed train that offers services to its passenger composing like comfortable seats and on-board services.
Therefore
, it is easy to see that why their argument has gained support.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to make an opposing case. It is often argued that government is responsible for preserving and improving existing public
transit
.
Firstly
, people expect their payments to the government will allot to the projects that provide more convenience for the citizens, not to be wasted on
such
a project that will be probably abandoned someday in the future. Being said that, wealth should be spent on the current public
transit
enhancements.
Secondly
, it is
also
believed that the fund gained from people should be spent on a variety of sections. While other potions are far from an appropriate level, large sums of fund wasted to construct new amenities
such
as very fast trains
instead
.
Thus
, it goes without saying that their viewpoint is credible and realistic.
To conclude,
this
essay examined many expenditures on new railway construction and old public
transit
improvement. In my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, I believe, authorities do not have to lose focus on new technologies and should use it to build new facilities to make a modern city that would bring more ease to people’s lives.