Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

The growing number of flights contributes to more pollution and environmental issues, and

therefore

people suggest the government to increase the tax for

air

traffic. I,

however

, strongly disagree with the solution given. In the current scenario, airplanes and other aircraft, as the evidence suggests, have a lot of adverse effects on the nearby communities as they constantly produce loud noise and emit pollutants. The constructions of new facilities generally occupy

the large

Suggestion

larger

areas where the plantations or old villages were originally located.

For example

, the buildings of a new airport in Thailand have covered the agricultural regions, which affect the farmers and the villagers having low life quality.

Besides

, the yields from flights haven’t seemed to be employed for solving the problems, and all of which go to the investors. It is evidently detrimental for people, so some citizens may find doubling the flight taxes interesting, hoping that it will decrease the negative consequences from the

air

traffic.

However

, oversees transportation is becoming more and more necessary for working people and travellers.

Therefore

, heavy taxing of

air

flights will result in expensive tickets and surge the expenditure for each journey.

Also

, the high fees don’t directly solve the situations, and even get them worse. The possible consequences are the shift of travelling types and the drop of the overall national economy. The changes of transportation

not only burden

Suggestion

aren't only burdening

the passengers, but they

also

have a high tendency to produce

more hazardous outcome

Suggestion

a more hazardous outcome

more hazardous outcomes

such

as, greenhouse gases and the traffic congestion. In terms of finance, the

air

flights are owned by the government; if the sales of the tickets fall off, it means the less income of the country. With all these reasons, I, in my opinion, recommend the business owners to compensate their effects to the people, and plan the new locations for expanding the premises that don’t bother the residents. In conclusion, I don’t agree with the increasing rate of taxes on aircraft, but I do want the organizations to improve their responsibilities to the environment and communities around the buildings.

In addition

, they should serve good services for the surrounding residential places.