Nowadays, due to constantly increasing population accommodation demand has increased as well. 
Thus
, authorities of some municipal areas tackle Linking Words
this
 issue by constructing high-rise buildings. Meanwhile, there are cities that address it by using a much wider area for construction. In Linking Words
this
 essay, I will consider which solution is more beneficial. 
On the one side are those residential areas, which are under construction of skyscrapers. Linking Words
This
 approach is suitable for those urban areas where lands are limited, while population-density is high. Linking Words
Thus
, vertical planning is the best solution for high-density cities because Linking Words
this
 away it is easier to satisfy housing demand and provide infrastructure for it. Linking Words
For example
, Hong Cong is situated on a group of Islands and the city is one of the most populated cities. 
On the other side are those built-up areas where citizens prefer to build accommodation in widespread areas. Linking Words
This
 course of action is feasible in case if a city has vast empty lands surrounding it, which can be available and suitable for residential construction. Linking Words
This
 method provides the opportunity to create a balanced environment where low-rise buildings naturally alternate trees and park zones. Linking Words
In addition
, Linking Words
this
 kind of built-up is more practical and safe in earthquake hazardous regions Linking Words
such
 as my hometown Linking Words
that is
 surrounded by a mountain range. 
In conclusion, both sides have their merits and there is no better option or one solution for all cities. Linking Words
This
 is because both approaches solve specific problems and proceed from the conditions of an area.Linking Words