In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

In the modern tech - world,
video
surveillance has become commonplace in many cities. While many people argue that using
video
cameras in public areas is an invasion of privacy, I do believe that the advantages of using
this
outweigh the disadvantages. There are some reasons why people might disapprove of
video
monitoring in public areas.
First
of all, many people think that they are constantly being watched by the authorities and security cameras curtail their individual freedom.
In addition
, the feeling of being watched is unpleasant, even when the camera may not actually be recording.
Secondly
, the use of surveillance cameras in public areas is that it costs big money. Since it is not effective enough to deter crimes and theft, why would we spend too much money in it Despite of some drawbacks mentioned above, I believe using security cameras is a good way of providing safety. Using CCTV to monitor public areas is one of the best actions to reduce crime rate and deter criminals.
For instance
, shoplifters and pickpockets are less likely to operate places where
video
surveillance is working.
Furthermore
,
video
evidence is being recorded in
this
equipment helps to catch and prosecute offenders and offers valuable support to police officers. By using them, most cities safer for inhabitants, workers and visitors alike. To sum up, having analysed both the merits and demerits, it is evident that security cameras are immensely beneficial for keeping a check on criminals and criminal activity.
Thus
, the advantages of installing CCTVs definitely outweigh the disadvantages which are rather insignificant.
Submitted by King Street on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Surveillance cameras
  • Public safety
  • Deterrent
  • Evidence collection
  • Apprehend perpetrators
  • Public spaces
  • Invasion of privacy
  • Civil liberties
  • Abuse of power
  • Misuse
  • Cost implications
  • Monitoring
  • Maintenance
  • Essential services
  • Justice system
What to do next:
Look at other essays: