Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree?

Development in relation to Nationhood is very crucial to any Country. The rate at which positive growth is being achieved has affected the livelihood of many citizens in any given

Nation

. I am of the view that development is a bedrock on which all other sectors of the

nation

requires for a sustainable advancement and has a result of

this

, there are no relationship between it and climatic degeneration. The poor state of a country can only be controlled if there are positive movements in the areas of education, transportation, electricity, social amenities and infrastructures.

For example

, education is an important tool required in

Nation

building. It not only equips the population with the required knowledge needed in self sustenance but it

also

contributes to the development of all other aspects of positive changes while

on the other hand

, it educates every stakeholder on the dangers of climate changes.

Furthermore

, the achievements gained in the rapid emancipation of a country outweighs the climatic and environmental factors that pose as a treat in any given

Nation

.

For instance

, the newly completed factory on a Lagos street which produces more than half a million shoes

that is

needed by children of school going age is termed as a positive development.

This

will ensure that there are less importation of materials at the local factory concentrates more on the use of local materials and at the same time, job opportunities are created for the locals of the town.

Although

, the pollution that comes from the factory has been adequately managed so as not to pose as a threat to human health. Conclusively, If a

Nation

is to change for the betterment of its citizenry and alleviate the problems faced by its citizenry, it should embrace the adequate usage of both human and material resources effectively and efficiently.