Very few school children learn about the value of money and how to look after it, yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as a part of school curriculum. Do you agree or disagree?

Whether

money

management should be a part of the academic curriculum is a great debate. Most of the schools are already overwhelmed with the subjects they have to teach and adding personal financial affairs to the syllabus would make things worse.

Moreover

,

this

is a

skill

that teachers cannot instil in a child through lectures and exams and

this

is why I personally believe that parents should take

this

responsibility.

To begin

with, no matter how many chapters someone reads or how many

exams he

Accept comma addition

exams, he

takes on the value of

money

in life, until he takes the responsibility and earns it, is impossible to learn the practical

aspect

of personal finances. Teachers are not in a position to decide whether a student should work

besides

study and manage his finance. Parents,

on the other hand

, are ideal to handle

this

. They can teach their children the value of

money

and put them in situations when they need to take responsibilities.

Moreover

, learning to manage someone's finance is a different type of

skill

that class lectures cannot teach.

Finally

, a teacher does not know every

aspect

of a student's family and their financial condition.

This

is why the same lecture is not suitable for all students. Parents are in a far better position to let their children learn

this

essential life

skill

. To conclude,

money

management is a practical

aspect

of life and theoretical classes are ineffective to develop

this

great

skill

. Parents,

on the contrary

, should take command of

this

aspect

and prepare their children how to value

money

and handle personal finance efficiently.