Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open, and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media (TV, newspaper, Internet). Do you agree with this view, or do you think that in some circumstances governments should limit the freedom of media?

In

this

modern era, it is easy for people to update news through mass media. Some say that thinkings and tidings should be allowed to surf and watch in freedom. There is

also

an argument that it needs to be managed by the government. In

this

essay, I would examine the roots of the matter and offer some statements of mine. We are living in the 21st

century which

Accept comma addition

century, which

is considered

as

Suggestion

at

the time of digital technology. People have the desire to receive

information

from every corner of the world. Thanks to the mass media, people can know what is happening in the other countries, just with their phones, televisions or newspapers. By

this

way,

instead

of taking a week in the library to find out

information

in documents and books, students can complete their studies quickly and effectively with 0.1-

second

surfing on the Internet.

However

, the drawback of

this

issue is that some people with evil purposes find

information

for their terrorist acts or look for accomplices. Recently,

government

Suggestion

a government information hacker

the government information hacker

information

hacker has appeared and has become serious. It might not be difficult for the investigative teams to find out the clues of the cases, or look for pieces of messages containing plots of offenders. Dealing with the high number of murder, kidnap, assault and drug dealing, especially cybercrime, a solution is for the government to censor the

information

sought by network users to maximize global security. But keeping user

privacy secure

Accept comma addition

privacy, secure

should

also

be one of the top priorities.