In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?

it

Suggestion

It

is considered by some that safeguarding the wilderness should be prioritized over constructing houses despite the fact that the earth is going out of capacity for humans. In my opinion, we should satisfy both sides of

this

scenario and maintain the countryside beside our building. On the one hand, the earth breath through its wilderness

such

as jungles and densely forested areas,

in addition

to it, the majority of these blessings from God are irreplaceable,

in other words

, losing these gifted creatures are equal to fully disappearances of them.

Consequently

, by protecting these intact habitats, no only are we guaranteeing the earth's well being but

also

human survival.

On the other hand

, the ruler of

this

universe is the human race and the quality of life had been a matter of humanity in most occasions.

As a result

, they have been struggling for shelters to secure themselves from all dangers existing outside, and

also

breeding for the

next

generation have been necessary too.

Therefore

, building house is part and parcel of our lives and

also

a requisite for human living which can not be neglected.

Finally

, I believe that human beings should make a trade-off between residence building and protecting the countryside, in order to achieve

this

goal governments should legislate some rules and regulations,

for example

, planting a tree for each household they build. In

this

way, we are able to save the globe and our life simultaneously. In conclusion, the debate over building a house and protecting intact areas can be over if we implement the mixture of both views.