In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constricting new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is often argued that constructing new railway lines for speed change between cities is worth and necessary to invest with a great deal of money,

however

, Some commentators believe that investment on the development of existing public transport is more useful. In my opinion, I am strongly inclined to the view that the money should be balanced to consume on both new lines and current public transportation. We will discuss both these views, in

this

essay. Nowadays, many local people who live in remote areas are struggling with accessibility to use high technology transportations

such

as high speed trains, sky trains, and subways to visit other cities. It is one of the well infrastructure which citizens should be able to access rightfully not only people in the capital but

also

people in rural areas.

Furthermore

, Inventing on the new railway line construction can increase an income for local sellers, and the economy progress can rise up significantly because travellers might be attracted an incentive by how convenience to go to sightseeing places in many distinguishing cities. To illustrate, The economy in Japan has been increasing for a decade in tourism industry: tourists can travel from Tokyo to Osaka, where is located in the south of Japan, easily via a very high speed train which is called "Shinkansen."

Thus

, It is very profitable to have very fast trains between regions.

on

Suggestion

On

the other hand, an exiting public transport plays as an imperative role in our daily life because it is advantageous for decreasing traffic congestions in many areas particularly the capitals.

Moreover

, it can decline greenhouse gas emissions which can cause global warming issues.

For example

, Vancouver has quality battery electric buses, which are zero emission, for their people. So, many people rarely use private cars compared to people who choose public transports as a choice for travelling. These reasons contributed Vancouver to be ranked on top 10 best cities in the world for quality of living. As far as I concerned, I would reiterate that both of investing money on the construction of new railway lines in improving existing public transportation are important and equally because they impact on people's life, environment, and economy.