Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

In order to tackle

traffic

issues

such

as congestions and environmental contamination, it is assumed that a rise in petrol cost may help.

Although

I partly agree

to

Suggestion

with

the given idea, I suppose that there are still numerous steps could be taken as well. Imposing higher price of petrol,

firstly

, could alleviate man-made damage on the environment. In lieu of using private vehicles, people would be more likely to opt for public ones as money spent energy is raised and become unaffordable.

In addition

to that, it is inevitable that there could be enormous influence exerted on nature during the production of gas.

Subsequently

, the less petrol consumption people make, the less energy would be manufactured.

Therefore

, not only would less carbon footprint be

made but

Accept comma addition

made, but

traffic

would

also

be less congested.

Furthermore

, several measures are suggested to cope with the issues.

Initially

, governments should levy heavily on car taxes since

such

private vehicles are main factor contributed to both growing

traffic

and pollution problems. Public transportation system,

moreover

, should be upgraded and well-furnished so as to attract travellers.

Besides

, if people are offered with affordable or rather cheap price, they are more likely to use the service frequently.

Last

but not least, city councils should make great effort to influence their citizens to act for the environment by living greener. In conclusion, despite the fact that putting a levy on gas cost is a worth-noting idea, I still hold a belief that other solutions are

possibly

Suggestion

possible

helpful in dealing with

traffic

and pollution issues.