School are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students to find a job. To what extent do you agree and disagree?

History

is a part of the subject, most of the schools teaching to their students. Some people think, it should be less focused, as well as the time could be invested on the other valuable skill developments. As an introduction,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

would nurture studying the past, at the same point, it could be done with the proper time management.

First

and foremost, learning the

history

is mandatory. We could not shape the future, without knowing the past. So many countries invaded others, even continents and it had many impacts, positive as well as negative. It helped to develop the civilization, culture and overcome wrong believes. As an example, everyone knows about the

history

of the telephone, it was invented by Mr.Graham bell and are massive in the size and today we have the compact mobile phone. We know the past and the old technology,

thus

come up with the new advanced communication solutions.

Secondly

,

history

should occupy a part of the study, since it provides a lot of information, how we have been developed in the science, culture as well as fashion.

For example

, several decades ago auto manufacturing had several flaws,

such

as high fuel consumption, more carbon emission, safety features which are overcome by latest technology.

Lastly

, The Governments around the world, should prepare a syllabus and implement the education system, with more concentration on the skill development and

further

support their future career. As a conclusion, I would be ambiguous on the importance of the

history

Suggestion

historical

subject taught by the institutions. At the same point, it is most important to focus on the skills development of the each student, based on their interest and traditional subjects could be selective basis.