Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as pevert and health care. To what extent do you agree?

There is no doubt that the amount of money which spend on the protection of wild animals and their territory.

However

, that expenditures could be addressed to solve some of the public issues in the communities. I completely disagree with the idea that all animals have rights as humans and they are crucial for environmental balance. The main reason why I disagree with idea that, spending should be cut off is that the lack of habitat for millions of species can result in the extinction of some species and an ecological imbalance.

In other words

, having an imbalance around the world, which derives from destroying natural habitat, can cause to increase considerably in global warming as there are not enough trees to absorb greenhouse gases. To illustrate, protecting trees by spending money can help to prohibit climate change soon by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Another point to consider is that all living creatures on the earth have rights as well as people, and we have a responsibility to protect those creatures on

this

planet.

That is

to say, all of the animals and natural habitats should be taken care of at the same degree because biodiversity is essential for the well-being of the planet, and people should be encouraged to create funding for protecting the ecosystem.

For example

, people can develop breeding programs for endangered species and organize guards to decline illegal hunting or poaching since they are the main reasons for declining numbers.