Do you think businesses should hire employees who will spend their entire lives working for the company? Explain why do you agree or disagree. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

Corporate companies are employing the candidates who give their entire career for the

company

. I personally disagree with

this

procedure, holding to

one

group for

l

Add an article

a

show examples

ifetime could lead them to miss great opportunities which are waiting for them outside.

This

essay will explain the reasons to support my statement by taking examples from newspapers and journals.

To begin

with, candidates employing long-term with the

organisation

could lead them to numerous problems.

One

among them is, losing big opportunities which could enhance their career with higher wage or position in different

organisation

. Most importantly, spending complete live with

one

company

would give them to learn only

one

skill in their entire career.

For instance

, a recent survey conducted by the Times of New York revealed that 65% of employees who work with

one

business mastered only

one

skill in their 35-years of experience with the business.

As a result

, at the end of their retirement, these people are not satisfied with their job.

Secondly

, companies hiring employees for lifetime guarantee for their work could lead them to lose huge money, if the

company

decided to shut their business due to low profits.

This

could navigate them to pay redundancy payment, annual leaves, and notice period payment.

Therefore

,

this

is a big burden on the

organisation

.

For example

, the shutting down of Holden manufacturing in Australia made the group to pay a lot of money to the employees who signed a full-time commitment to the

company

.

Finally

, companies seeking employees for entire lifetime responsibility could be a great disadvantage for both the candidate and the

company

.

Thus

, I personally disagree that long time promise with

one

organisation

is not recommended.