Some people think that in order to produce a happy society, it is necessary to ensure that there is only a small difference between the earnings of the richest and poorest. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A few

people

believe that the community could be harmonious and happier if the financial dissimilarities between the affluent and the less well-off are paltry. I completely concur with

this

notion, as

this

is pivotal for

people

to lead a trouble-free and mentally healthier life.

To begin

with, in

this

contemporary era, there has always been a huge disparity between the well-off and the ordinary class

people

.

Hence

, socialists opine that if the government imposes a norm on

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

wealthy individuals to share a considerable amount of their wealth with the disadvantaged, it can pave the way for accommodating the vital necessities of the poor section of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society and eventually

enabling

Wrong verb form

enable

show examples

all the residents to have a flourishing and joyful life.

For instance

, few students who are skilful yet

lacking

Wrong verb form

lack

show examples

the funds to continue with their studies or research can

be

Verb problem

benefit

show examples

immensely

benefitted

Verb problem

apply

show examples

from

this

move

and

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

ultimately increasing the literacy percentage

as well as

attracting foreign establishments to set bases in the motherland

due to

the presence of a plethora of well-educated professionals.

Therefore

, it is apparent that if the rich

would

Verb problem

apply

show examples

share the wealth with the poor, it is extremely beneficial to the community as a whole.

Furthermore

, there has been a steady increase in

Juveline

Correct your spelling

juvenile

crimes throughout the world mainly

due to

the frighteningly increasing poverty rates and illiteracy solely

due to

deprivation of monetary resources.

This

can be curbed in two ways by the authorities.

Firstly

, these youngsters could be reformed if they are given appropriate funds to make their

both

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

ends meet.

Hence

, these individuals when funded would tend to be extremely devoted to building their lives if there is only a negligible difference between the rich and the poor.

Secondly

, the government must

also

occasionally reward the wealthy section of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society by brimming them with accolades if they habitually share a large proportion of their wealth with the economically advantaged

people

.

This

way, the socialists' goal of sharing prosperity could be accomplished and equally slowly bridging the huge gap between the affluent and less wealthy

people

. Sweden

for instance

mandatorily taxes high earners heavily and at the same time, provides a plethora of financial support to the economically weaker

people

.

This

is one reason why the Scandinavian nation has a meagre difference between the rich and poor and

also

is the reason for the country's high happiness and literacy index.

To conclude

, community members, are always of the opinion that funds must always be shared by the rich with the poor to reduce the sky-high crimes in the society and most importantly to experience a peaceful, flourishing, and joyful life. I completely

accord

Verb problem

agree

show examples

with

this

opinion, as

this

benefits every citizen in all aspects and I opine that it is

an

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

absolute

Change the word

absolutely

show examples

imperative to have a meagre difference between

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

high earners and low-wage individuals.