Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older, while others think they should stay at home with the family. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent times, a myriad of parents often

motivate

Change the verb form

motivates

show examples

youngsters to move out of the houses once they have grown into adults so that they can be self-directed and create a unique path of their own. While a few people accord with

this

notion, others oppose

this

view and stress that children should stay with their parents indefinitely. In my opinion, both these arguments need proper scrutinization before reaching a conclusion.

To begin

with, contemporary children have become excessively inclined to their parents and

lack

a vision of their own .

Hence

, modern parents believe that their grown-up son or daughter must be allowed to lead a

life

of their own once they have matured to be highly successful in all aspects. The central reason behind

this

is twofold,

firstly

, over-pampered children would evidently

lack

the skills needed to overcome complex hurdles and

this

practice would certainly refine their understanding of the outer world and be psychologically equipped to face obstacles.

Secondly

, allowing adolescents to step out once they have cognitively advanced could enable them to choose their field of best interest without any parental pressure and in countries

such

as the US,

this

practice is being adopted widely and has surprisingly proven to be overwhelmingly fruitful.

In contrast

, opponents of isolating teenagers cite that those unfortunate youngsters might have serious repercussions if they are left unsupervised.

This

is because it is intuitively obvious that they

lack

the requisite knowledge of what is right or wrong around them and

this

could attract grave repercussions when they have to make crucial decisions in their

life

such

as getting married or spending their hard-earned money.

Furthermore

,

this

habit would undoubtedly cause resentment to those youngsters owing to

lack

of care and warmth, which they were brimmed with by their parents while were at home.

Besides

, youngsters must be obligated to live along with their parents lifelong to take care of the elderly and live with harmony, which provides a greater sense of satisfaction and fulfilment to

life

and the aforementioned qualities could not be attained if people develop an isolated living. To conclude,

although

parents these days accord that their kids must move on to start a new

life

of their own to tackle challenging conditions and to mould themselves into a responsible and flourishing adult. Opponents,

however

, object

this

idea and think that

this

could inflict more harm to the youngsters than the meagre benefits it could bestow. After reviewing both sides of the argument, I opine the latter view to be far more advantageous and meaningful than the former.

Hence

, I agree that children must remain with their parents and must bury the idea of stepping out forever.