the most effective way to solve traffic and pollution problems is to encourage people to move from suburbs into the city. To what extent do you agree and disagree.

Traffic problems are increasing at an alarming rate throughout the world. There are some people

t

Add a pronoun

who

show examples

hink that

this

can be minimised by promoting city migration. I totally disagree with

this

standpoint because it is impractical in many ways.

To begin

with, when migration is in place, employees, who previously lived in a rural area, no longer has to commute long distances since they stay nearby their worksite.

Consequently

, the number of vehicles on the road would be experienced a dramatic decline.

Additionally

,

for example

, poisonous emissions from the motor-vehicles

also

are limited. Despite the fact, the majority of the cities are starved for a place to accommodate their present population and

thus

,

this

plan is impossible to implement. The best method is to reduce the issue is that encourage business firms to relocate their production units to rural areas and they could recruit workers there itself. By doing

this

, the employees may not require to commute cities and eventually, traffic jam

also

would be reduced.

Moreover

, since the native can earn handsome money in their locality, they hardly migrate to any other destinations.

For instance

,

I

Add an article

the

show examples

ndian government motivates its industries to move away from city-centre to diminish the consequences related to traffic and air pollution. In conclusion, it is thought that city-dwelling is the effective measure to counteract the ill-effect of vehicles on the road and pollutants from its emission. In my opinion, I firmly reiterate

this

may not be a feasible solution since many urban areas are chocked and saturated with their exiting residents.