In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general educational across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrowly range of subjects to related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today’s world?

There is currently a contentious argument whether to have commonly education

content

or to have a specific one aiming at a specific occupation. In

this

essay, I am going to examine

this

question from both points of views and

then

explain why I believe the arguments for commonly education

content

are stronger.

Firstly

, there are people who believe that the benefits of having an overview of different subjects can pave the way for the future of students. The main reason for believing

this

is that people could be prepared in different aspects of their lives not only for career proposes. To illustrate, even if a person had graduated as a lawyer, which predominates skills in reading, he will be able to calculate domestic expenses as well due to the math classes that he had during the high school.

On the other hand

, others believe that focusing on specific

content

for the work environment because in that way they would be prepared for the labour market. People often have

this

opinion due to the fact that several subjects during schooling is a waste of time and do not give them the experience a student need. A particularly good example here could be the person who wants to become an architect have no reasons for attending cooking classes, it would be useless for his life in all aspects. To conclude, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I feel that general education

content

is justified.

Therefore

, people could be more prepared in all aspects of life and not on only a specific theme there being no reason for that so far.