Although many people value their public parks, this space could be used other purpose such as residential areas for over growing population or to develop business and boost economics. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?

Nowadays,the number of the population has increased dramatically.There is not enough space for living.Some people believe that public parks should be replaced by residential areas which can help to expand economics and business.Personally,I strongly disagree that the parks should be used in other duties.

First

of all,the reason why we should prevent the parks is it could help to reduce pollution.At

this

moment,the proportion of factory and residential spaces rise significantly which release the greenhouse gas.

Then

it can affect our health.

Therefore

if we still have the parks ,it will be the equipment for slowing down the pollution.

For instance

,in Londo,the percentage of

g

Add an article

the

a

show examples

reen area

such

as the parks are higher than the building.

This

is because people think that it can provide them to get fresh air.

Moreover

,they construct residential areas in other places which do not impact the parks.

Furthermore

,another main reason is the parks can provide many activities for people to select.

In addition

,it is the place where people make an appointment and have a new society.Most of the people usually go to the parks for having a picnic which is completely different compared with having a building.People will do not have a chance of playing an outdoor activity.

For instance

,I live in a suburb area which is near the public park and in

this

location.It does not have a huge building that cause I always visit the parks for spending the quality time with my family. In conclusion,the public park is the most important aspect of our life.People can do some outdoor activities with others.

Moreover

,the parks can help to cut down the emission.