wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people in the world argue about how to tackle the problem of refugees. Some parts of society believe that rich countries should accept refugees more than the amount they have had and give them basic needs

such

as a permanent place to live and food. I personally stand in between the argument of agreeing and disagree. The

first

reason to support the statement is that wealthy countries are generally believed to have a better income compared to the countries refugees come from. Better prosperity follows better income

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

so that

in other words

rich countries are able to provide basic needs for their people and the refugees as well.

Secondly

, there are a ton of non-government organizations who help refugees work and establish their program in rich countries. Compared to the developing countries, these organizations are more common in developed countries

such

as UN Migration in Australia, UK, Canada, and

U

Correct article usage

the

show examples

SA. They have expertise people to handle the problems of refugees.

On the other hand

, the needs of refugees are the responsibility of their home

country

. Refugees are residents of their home

country

who are suffering from an unfair situation so that they choose to move out and look for a better life. It means that the problem happened because of the failure of their

country

so that it is

also

their obligation to tackle the problem.

Also

, refugees are the people who need to be trained to be independent. If a

country

always supports them, they tend to be lazy and dependent on the help of others. Overall, it is a good thing if a rich

country

can support refugees with their basic assistance, but in my opinion

Add a comma

,

show examples

the refugees itself need to rise and fight for their own life.