wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people in the world argue about how to tackle the problem of refugees. Some parts of society believe that rich countries should accept refugees more than the amount they have had and give them basic needs
such
as a permanent place to live and food. I personally stand in between the argument of agreeing and disagree. The
first
reason to support the statement is that wealthy countries are generally believed to have a better income compared to the countries refugees come from. Better prosperity follows better income
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
so that
in other words
rich countries are able to provide basic needs for their people and the refugees as well.
Secondly
, there are a ton of non-government organizations who help refugees work and establish their program in rich countries. Compared to the developing countries, these organizations are more common in developed countries
such
as UN Migration in Australia, UK, Canada, and
U
Correct article usage
the
show examples
SA. They have expertise people to handle the problems of refugees.
On the other hand
, the needs of refugees are the responsibility of their home
country
. Refugees are residents of their home
country
who are suffering from an unfair situation so that they choose to move out and look for a better life. It means that the problem happened because of the failure of their
country
so that it is
also
their obligation to tackle the problem.
Also
, refugees are the people who need to be trained to be independent. If a
country
always supports them, they tend to be lazy and dependent on the help of others. Overall, it is a good thing if a rich
country
can support refugees with their basic assistance, but in my opinion
Add a comma
,
show examples
the refugees itself need to rise and fight for their own life.
Submitted by hardiyanti.marina.me on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Refugees
  • Asylum seekers
  • Humanitarian aid
  • Integration
  • Multiculturalism
  • Economic impact
  • Public services
  • International law
  • Conventions relating to the status of refugees
  • Labor market
  • Cultural enrichment
  • Burden-sharing
  • Resettlement programs
  • Host country
  • Border security
  • Comprehensive policy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: