Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

The cultural entertainment is educational and beneficial for the

population

. Governments Should have a balanced investment to even spend on entertainment as public services. It disagrees that governments invest

this

money in public services

instead

. Analysing that arts,

music

and theatre can raise money for futures investments and public services are already being invested in

first

world countries.

First

, it is undeniable that public services are a

population

needs, as favouring development and practicality.

However

, in

first

world countries, these investments are already been done, working completely well.

For example

, in Australia, when someone goes to the streets, can realise how clean and organise it is, or going to solve any issue on Australian government services, people can confirm that 90% of times they resolve what they need.

On the other hand

, arts,

music

and theatre are three important things, that evolve people`s fun entertainment and knowledge, as they are cultural, approaching, teaching and educating the

population

.

For instance

, research affirms that 67% of countries that have cultural activities are more developed than others, as

music

when introduced since Children can make their brains more rational and faster.

Moreover

, arts can induce kids to create, Sensex update, 34% of kids that start draw and paint have more potential being more successful when becoming adults. To conclude, it is undeniable that public services are a

population

needs leading practicality on people`s lives.

However

, investment in Arts,

such

as

music

and theatre are really important for the

population

`s knowledge and approach.

Hence

, Government Should have a balanced investment for both sides.