Most government money should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a strong argument among a large proportion of people that governments ought to allocate more of its annual budget for teaching
science
than different areas for developing a nation's economy. In my opinion, I am completely against
this
statement because other subjects are
also
vital for development and even most of the developing countries have already invested so much in
science
so far. It is an undeniable fact that let alone
science
professionals cannot build a strong
country
, people from other sectors are
also
required for
this
purpose.
In other words
, the primary sector that benefits a nation's growth is
business
. More
business
entities mean more revenue.
In addition
, in order to manage even hospitals and engineering companies, a commerce graduate or a
business
professional is required.
For instance
, most of the countries invite multinational companies to invest in their
country
,
hence
it will help to flourish its economy.
Moreover
, investing fund only in teaching
science
doesn't bring any fortune to any
country
.
This
is due to the fact that the progressing nations have already done
this
.
However
, there is no change in its GDP rate as of now.
For example
, India is a
country
that has been spending so much in the field of
science
. Even though its medical sector is popular, as a whole the
country
remains under the developing category.
Therefore
, funding only for improving scientifical studies cannot bring prosperity to any society. In conclusion, when it comes to funding allocation, governments should regard the
business
studies as the most important field, well above
science
education so that those investments can be recouped in the future.
Submitted by harisielts on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this siteโ€™s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay โ€“ it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general
Topic Vocabulary:
  • government funding
  • scientific research
  • technological advancements
  • economic growth
  • critical thinking
  • problem-solving skills
  • global challenges
  • talented individuals
  • scientific innovation
  • well-rounded education
  • diverse workforce
What to do next:
Look at other essays: