The use of the mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so the mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

contemporary era, technology is revolutionising every aspect of life. the mobile

phone

is one

such

development. It is believed that the use of the mobile

phone

is as equivalent to smoking and to be prohibited the usage of mobile devices in public places. I disagree with the statement that, the mobile

phone

should be banned

instead

it can be kept in silent mode. Obviously, on one side , it is evident that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

mobile

phone

causes some adverse effect on people's health. The main reason for

this

thought is the excessive usages of mobile cause radiation that enters the body and can cause cancer like a disease. whereas in smoking the same thing is happening. excessive smoking can result in lung cancer.

On the other hand

, it is often argued that in fact

instead

of prohibiting , masses have the opinion that the mobile

phone

should be kept in silence, because in a public place it creates disturbances to the other people, especially from the loud ringing tone or from the rough talking.

Next

, looking at the other fact that, mobile

phone

is essential for communication

moreover

it is crucial in case of emergency. It can be restricted in

such

places like petrol pump or some places like radiology or nuclear departments. other places

such

as devotional spots, while health care checkups can be kept in either silent or vibrant mode so that, it will not cause disturbances to others. To sum up, It is clear that, mobile

phone

usage is inevitable in

this

era.

However

, it's usage can be regulated in certain areas but it cannot be restricted as smoking.