In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Sometimes British people move to old-age homes when they become senior citizens for better treatment and expert
care
facilities. While some think it is the duty of the
government
to pay for the expenses, others believe their families should be responsible.
Although
there are arguments, I radically agree that the administration should take up the responsibility.
This
essay will discuss the views and explain why I think so.
To begin
with, families do definitely have a key role to take the responsibility for their elderly's expenses. Parents take
care
of their child,
consequently
, children are
also
responsible to look after them when they grow up.
For example
, some parents sacrifice so much for their kid's education, upbringing or basic regular expenses that they expect or depend on their children in their old life. Growing old is a natural instinct of anything living,
thus
everybody should be prepared for that from the beginning.
In other words
, people could feel helpless after reaching an age, when they would find that there is nobody to bear the expenses.
However
, some may not have enough earning to support the full family.
Furthermore
, families could not deny their roles in their elders' lives.
On the other hand
, the
government
should take responsibility for all the citizens till to the end. It has several reasons.
Firstly
, natives pay taxes for their whole working lives,
hence
this
money could be saved for their future.
For instance
, if 15% of tax is deducted from a person's salary, at least some percentage of
this
amount could be saved for his old age
care
.
Secondly
, sometimes there are people who do not have a family or not in touch with them,
therefore
, they would not get any facility in the former age if the authority does not support them. A man, aged 70 years,
for example
, died without treatment in India because he did not have any family to pay the bills.
Moreover
, the
government
taking expenses is a good step in order to maintain everybody's basic need. In conclusion,
this
essay has discussed both views. Though there are pros and cons of both opinions and both families as well as authorities are responsible for every old people to some extent, I reckon that paying for those getting old should be taken
care
by the
government
.
Submitted by riabiswas93 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Aging population
  • Elderly care
  • Nursing homes
  • Social welfare
  • Intergenerational responsibility
  • Caregiving
  • Financial burden
  • Quality of life
  • Pension funds
  • Healthcare policy
  • Taxation
  • Subsidies
  • Private insurance
  • Long-term care
  • Sustainability
What to do next:
Look at other essays: